ARTICLEhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.00.xmlEditorial2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.00.pdf2025-09-14Editorialhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.01.xmlThe US, China and the G-77 in the era of responsive patentability2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.01.pdf2025-09-14The US, China and the G-77 in the era of responsive patentabilityhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.02.xmlLife plus 50: striking a balance between the term of copyright protection and Jamaica's public domain2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.02.pdf2025-09-14Life plus 50: striking a balance between the term of copyright protection and Jamaica's public domainhttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.03.xmlEuropean patent law: a foreseeable future in the wake of the European Court of Justice Opinion 1/09 on the compatibility of the Draft Agreement creating a unified litigation patent system with the founding European Treaties?2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.03.pdf2025-09-14European patent law: a foreseeable future in the wake of the European Court of Justice Opinion 1/09 on the compatibility of the Draft Agreement creating a unified litigation patent system with the founding European Treaties?https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.04.xmlEconomics as a guide to developing public policies for biosimilar pharmaceutical products2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.04.pdf2025-09-14Economics as a guide to developing public policies for biosimilar pharmaceutical productshttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.05.xmlThe US Supreme Court in Mayo v Prometheus – taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine?2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.05.pdf2025-09-14The US Supreme Court in Mayo v Prometheus – taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine?https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.06.xmlFrom von Hannover (1) to von Hannover (2) and Axel Springer AG: do competing ECHR proportionality factors ever add up to certainty?2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.06.pdf2025-09-14From von Hannover (1) to von Hannover (2) and Axel Springer AG: do competing ECHR proportionality factors ever add up to certainty?https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.07.xmlBook review: Brigitte Lindner and Ted Shapiro (eds), Copyright in the Information Society: A Guide to National Implementation of the European Directive (Edward Elgar, 2011) xlvi + 598 pp2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.07.pdf2025-09-14Book review: Brigitte Lindner and Ted Shapiro (eds), Copyright in the Information Society: A Guide to National Implementation of the European Directive (Edward Elgar, 2011) xlvi + 598 pphttps://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.08.xmlBook review: Trevor Cook and Alejandro I Garcia, International Intellectual Property Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer, 2010) 464 pp2024-08-06https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/2-4/qmjip.2012.04.08.pdf2025-09-14Book review: Trevor Cook and Alejandro I Garcia, International Intellectual Property Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer, 2010) 464 pp